Non-Regressive Prediction in the "New Paradigm" Phase

During this phase, investors and analysts may rely on "non-regressive prediction." These are forecasts not grounded in historical data or traditional statistical models. Instead, they're based on optimistic expectations and the belief that the "new paradigm" will enable high and sustained returns. These predictions can be swayed by cognitive biases like unrealistic optimism, overconfidence, and herd behavior.

Consequences and Risks

Using "non-regressive prediction" during the "new paradigm" phase of a financial bubble can lead to risky investment decisions and inflated asset valuations. When the bubble bursts and the "new paradigm" proves unfounded, the consequences can be severe, with significant financial losses for investors.

Historical Examples

Financial history is replete with examples of speculative bubbles where "non-regressive prediction" played a major role. Some examples include the 17th-century Tulip Mania, the 19th-century Railway Mania, and the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s.

Conclusions

"Non-regressive prediction" during the "new paradigm" phase of a financial bubble is a dangerous phenomenon that can lead to poor investment decisions and substantial financial losses. It's crucial for investors and analysts to be aware of the risks associated with these types of forecasts and to rely on historical data and robust statistical models to make informed investment decisions.